The GameMaster's Poker
School
Lesson 22: Playing With Ace Huggers
I know
I'm not alone when I say that a lot of my opponents in No-limit
Hold'em (NLHE) games will stay in the hand if they have
Ace-anything as their hole cards. Sure, I play A-x sometimes, but mostly it's
A-10 or higher or it's when I'm in Late Position and most of
the players ahead of me have folded. But what I'm talking about
here is those who will cling to their A-x hands through thick
and thin; what I call "Ace huggers". It usually doesn't take
long to identify them because they'll frequently go to the
showdown if they have any prayer whatsoever of winning the
hand. Consequently, this is a group of opponents from whom you
can extract some $$$ if you understand how to play against
them.
Don't
get me wrong here, the Ace is an important card and I know it -
it obviously wins when you both have nothing - and it's tough
to beat when an Ace comes on the
flop. But is
it worth playing every hand? The answer to that is No.
Those who will hug their Aces are doomed to failure in
the long run, particularly when the other card is a 9 or
lower. Let me show you some stats, using A-8 offsuit as
the "average" hand our opponent is playing.
There are five basic
situations an Ace hugger will face:
1. A pocket pair: 2-2 to A-A versus
A-8
2. Two lower cards: 6-7 versus
A-8
3. One lower card and one higher
card: K-J versus A-8
4. One Ace, lower second card: A-5
versus A-8
5. One Ace, higher second card:
A-10 versus A-8
Case #1 is probably the rarest and is the
classic "race" situation, when the pair is lower than
both cards the hugger is holding. But it's not really a race, which
implies a 50-50 probability. For example, 2-2 versus A-8
in a one-on-one confrontation shows the pocket deuces
have a probability of 53% vs. 47% for the A-8. And if you
hold 7-7 versus A-8, the probability for the 7s is more
like 57%. Naturally, as the pocket pair gets larger, its
probability of success increases because the pair now
dominates the Ace's kicker. Your hand of 10-10 versus A-8
has a probability of success in the 71% range and A-A
will win 93% of the time. Yes, you're going to get a
pocket pair only one hand in 17 on average, but when they
do come, if you'll play them aggressively against the ace
huggers, the $$$ will come your way, plain and
simple.
Case #2, where you have two lower cards than
the hugger is more common and, to be fair, more difficult
to win. Let's say you have 6-7 suited in
the small blind and a raise comes from the Button. That
player may or may not be an Ace-hugger, but you may very
well be up against A-x because that's a great hand to use
for "stealing" the blinds. Again, I'm going to assume the
raiser has A-8 offsuit, but I'm going to ignore the
implications of the $$$ you already have in the pot, even
though that actually makes your probabilities even
better. If your suited 6-7 does not share a suit with the
raiser, your probability of winning is about 42%. If the
raiser's Ace is of the same suit as your hole cards, the
probability slips to 40%. If both of the raiser's cards
are of your suit, your probability of winning is about
36%. Of course, you have no way of knowing what suits
your opponent holds, so it's probably fair to just
consider yourself a 40-60 underdog in this
hand.
Case #3 is tricky and a lot of what I'll
say here applies to # 2 also. By playing one higher card and one
lower card, most of the time you're going to be a 55-45
or thereabouts underdog. But you do have two "live" cards
that will likely interfere with the hugger's Straight and
of Flush-making ability. With me on that? Your cards are
live because they're of different ranks than your
opponent's cards, plus if you hold a hand like K-J, your
opponent's ability to make a Straight and perhaps a Flush
is diminished because you have some of his "outs". I
placed an emphasis on Straights and Flushes here because
those are the hands that can really mess up your great
hand, like Two-Pair, a King-high Straight or a King-high
Flush. When you know your opponent is an Ace-hugger and
s/he has limped into the pot (as they so often do), how
to play your hand becomes more a case of pot odds than
anything else. Let me give you an example using KsQc
versus Ad8d, which is about as bad as it can get. Your
probability is exactly 40% and your opponent's
probability is 60% if we ignore ties (see how much this
is like Case # 2?). With a 40% probability preflop, it
makes sense for you to get involved with the hand if the
pot is giving you 1.5 to 1 or better odds. So, if the
blinds are 25-50 and the hugger limps along with two
other players, the pot will be 225 when it gets to you.
Should you limp in, the pot is offering over 4 to 1 odds,
which is great, but you won't have any idea on where you
stand with the hand. If you make a standard 3x BB raise
of 150, you'll be getting - drumroll, please - exactly
1.5 to 1 odds. The Ace-hugger will likely call (they're
known as "huggers" for a reason) and perhaps some of the
other limpers will also call, so in this case 1.5 to 1
odds are the minimum, but of course with others in the
pot, you're probabilty will likely be lower. Should
someone other than the hugger reraise, you'll probably
have to fold, but before you do that, ask yourself if
that player was trapping by limping with a pocket pair -
in which case you're probably toast - or if you will
still have decent pot odds (say, 2 to 1) to call. A lot
of players will limp in Early Position with middle- and
low pairs, like 88 to 22, but when someone raises, it
seems to bring out the gambler in them, so they'll
frequently reraise. Since I'm assuming you're going to
raise here with only a decent hand, to imagine you still
have a probability of over 33% isn't unrealistic, so if
the pot odds are still good, call. Remember, even against
a small pair (22 to 88) a hand like K-Q is still at 40+%
probability preflop.
The
flop will reveal a lot to you. If the hugger is still in and no
Ace comes on the flop, but one of your cards pairs, you
probably have the best hand. However, if an Ace does fall and
you don't have Two-Pair, it's probably time to fold if the
hugger bets. I say
"if" because many players check when they have top pair on the
flop. If the hugger bets the flop, you may be up against
Two-Pair, depending upon what s/he has as a kicker. If the
hugger checks, it's good for you in any event because you might
be able to improve your hand. However, if I made Two-Pair or
better on the flop, I'm betting when it's checked to me,
whether or not an Ace fell. Sure, I might lose to Aces up
(Two-Pair with Aces), but my bet here will better define my
position in the pot. If the hugger has only a pair of Aces,
most likely s/he will just call with the idea that I'm betting
second pair (the next card lower than the Ace) and a pair of
Aces are still good. If the hugger raises me, it could be s/he
is afraid of a Straight or Flush draw that's on the board or
s/he already has Aces up. Personally, I'd perceive the latter
as being most likely and would fold. I don't need to win every
pot.
Case #4 is when you have an Ace with a
lower kicker. In my example of A-5 versus the
hugger's A-8, you're a 2 to 1 underdog with a probability
for winning of only about 35%. If the pot odds (2 to 1)
warrant a call and you do so, hitting Two-Pair on the
flop is the best chance you've got. Of course, your
opponent may hit a better Two-Pair, thus rendering your
hand useless, which is why I won't typically play
Ace-little against most Ace-huggers. I really want to
stick with A-9 or higher, like I'll explain in Case # 5.
Being dominated like this sucks.
Case #5, where I have an Ace with a
higher-than-average kicker moves the odds to my side, so
I will play this hand against known
huggers. For
example, A-10 (my namesake hand) is, in NLHE poker all
but worthless in Early Position. However, if I can limp
in against an opponent who will play Ace-anything, I've
got a fighting chance. In such a confrontation, my
probability is nearly 70%, so even making or calling a
raise can be profitable, especially if it gets me heads
up with the hugger. If an Ace comes on the flop, I'm
betting if first to act or will raise if my opponent acts
first and places a bet. The trick here is to define my
hand: Am I up against Two-Pair? A re-raise by my opponent
will trip an alarm that'll at least slow me down to a
check-call mode. If there is no Ace on the flop, my
opponent may have paired his kicker, which leaves me with
a 20% or less probability. But I'll never know that
unless I either bet or raise. Depending upon my
opponent's reaction, I'll fold or call - it may be a
mistake (or timid play) to go into check-call mode, but I
sure don't want to risk my tournament on a hand where I
have no pair. For me to continue with an A-x hand against
a known Ace-hugger, I really need to have paired my Aces.
Beyond that, it's an easy hand to get away
from.
Conclusion
Like
most of my lessons in this section, I'm not trying to present
an "ABC" way of playing, but am trying to get you familiar with
some of the odds you need to know and some of the concepts for
playing various hands. We never know exactly what hands our
opponents are holding - at least in a preflop situation - so to
say you should play every hand of A-10 or whatever only in one
way is not going to make you a successful player. I like poker
so much because I like solving puzzles and, while there's
usually only one way to solve a puzzle, there are a lot of ways
to win a hand at poker.
I'll see
you here next time.
|